Israel's Allies Fed Up With Its Reckless Government

The confusion over the actions of Israel's present administration does not stem from its adversaries globally; rather, these foes see it as an invaluable advantage. Instead, it is Israel’s supporters—the nations that supported them politically and stood united during their necessity to engage militarily with Hamas following the horrific events of October 7—who now feel bewildered and exhausted.

Last week, Britain, France, and Canada stated emphatically that they can no longer tolerate the human toll from endless wars without a clear endgame in sight.

It appears there is no clear strategy, particularly none that would warrant additional deaths and devastation like those witnessed in Gaza, or the unavoidable further sacrifice of more Israeli soldiers.

Refusing humanitarian assistance and reluctantly allowing aid only to evade being labeled as responsible for causing starvation is an additional blot on their record, despite legitimate worries over Hamas diverting aid supplies.

If supporting such a policy is necessary to be considered pro-Israel, then we are demanding too much.

Despite being challenging to classify as part of the "left-wing deep state," even U.S. President Donald Trump has grown frustrated. He sidestepped the Netanyahu administration to directly engage in negotiations for the release of Edan Alexander, expressing concerns over the situation in Gaza. During a recent trip to the area, he also chose not to meet with Israeli officials, further showing his disapproval.

Most Israelis back a ceasefire.

Survey upon survey indicates that approximately 70% of Israelis favor a agreement aimed at bringing all the hostages back and ceasing hostilities. It might be argued that Israel’s key allies are better attuned to the desires of the Israeli populace rather than their current administration’s stance.

Although I haven't come across a compelling rationale for renewing hostilities in Gaza Even though a ceasefire agreement was established, there remains no clear plan beyond potential reconquest as suggested by certain government officials. Simply put, you cannot eliminate an extreme ideology unless you cut off what fuels it. Escalating this conflict further and even more so reclaiming lost territories will only exacerbate the situation instead.

It is disgraceful – hillul Hashem — that the release of all the hostages, whether alive or deceased, is not considered the highest priority by this administration. A member of the Likud party from last week criticized those who were released as hostages, with several opposing further escalation of the conflict, labeling them as "controlled by Hamas." While it may seem distasteful to even acknowledge these remarks, they highlight the disdain certain members within the governing alliance hold towards their citizens.

People have the ability to hold their leaders accountable. the ballot box Over time, it appears that evading responsibility is one of this administration's top goals. The government seems more focused on countering its supposed internal adversaries rather than bolstering crucial international partnerships to fend off external threats to Israel. When faced with deciding whether to foster global backing or suppress local dissent, they opt for the latter.

The new legislation will severely undermine organizations and civil society.

As such, the bill presented to the Knesset at the beginning of this month aims to address something quite remarkable. An 80% tax rate applies to every donation. Received by Israeli non-governmental organizations from foreign governments unless these NGOs get backing from the Israeli government. This proposed law could let the finance minister, who is presently Bezalel Smotrich, exempt such groups from taxes at his own discretion. Intentionally, this new legislation aims to debilitate nearly 100 organizations that serve as the cornerstone of Israel’s civic sector.

This action is insulting to the democratic nations that offer financial support. As their contributions diminish, some of the most disadvantaged groups in Israel—including Jews, Arabs, and particularly vulnerable populations like asylum seekers—will face adverse consequences.

At the same time, as governmental policies go against what most Israelis want, this bill could severely harm groups that monitor their actions. Certain non-governmental organization (NGO) efforts can be bothersome for both present and future administrations, and they might also make those who love Israel uneasy—there were instances where I disagreed with specific projects too. However, enduring such scrutiny is essential for maintaining a democratic society.

This bill is also disrespectful towards Jewish philanthropists globally. Numerous groups being targeted were founded through diaspora contributions. This is why I, alongside other Zionist benefactors, have contacted Foreign Minister Gideon Sa'ar, imploring him to evaluate the potential harm this could cause to Israel’s ties with democratic partners, its connections with global Jewry, and its standing as a liberal democracy. The measure aligns much closer with tactics used by autocratic governments trying to suppress democratic activities rather than reflecting the principles upheld by a democratic nation valuing liberty, diversity, and acceptance of differing opinions.

Disabling Israel’s civil society, which took over to address the void left when the administration failed during the disorder after October 7, won’t logically enhance Israel’s safety or security. Instead, it would simply eliminate a barrier for members of this current government who aim to retake control of Gaza, incorporate the West Bank, push forward with the constitutional challenge initiated in 2023, and render outdated the core Zionist idea of maintaining a nation that is simultaneously Jewish and democratic.

Israel is losing backing when it needs it the most. The global alliance that successfully countered Iran’s missile attacks demonstrated how crucial Israel’s partnerships remain. Israel rightfully deserves assistance from its allies amid external dangers. However, it might want to reconsider some approaches. impeding the support Of those same allies for Israeli non-governmental organizations simply because they find them inconvenient.

In liberal democracies, political influence is not permanent. Should those who pass this bill eventually become part of the opposition, the laws they enact today might later be employed to disadvantage groups and initiatives they support. Any authoritarian measures enacted will inevitably result in dictatorial consequences, regardless of which party holds power.

No greater justice exists than the right of the Jewish people to govern themselves in their homeland. However, the principles established in Israel’s Declaration of Independence—a democracy based on rule of law, equality for all citizens, and the quest for stable peace—are under constant attack internally. Israeli non-governmental organizations are vital in maintaining and amplifying these ideals. They form an integral part of the tapestry of the Jewish community.

This bill is not only an attack on NGOs but on the democratic foundations of Israel. It antagonizes allies. It alienates Diaspora Jews. It is undemocratic, and it should be scrapped.

The individual serves as the co-founder of The London Initiative, was formerly the CEO of the British Conservative Party, and previously chaired the UK Jewish Leadership Council.

Share :