Newsom Warns Women of Imminent Dystopian Health Threat in Bizarre Statement

Gavin Newsom wants California Women should stock up on branded abortion medications such as mifepristone to protect themselves from 'abortion limitations driven by politics.' Donald Trump .

Mifepristone is used as one of the two medications in terminating a pregnancy. Initially, an individual takes mifepristone, which is then followed by misoprostol. This medication is presently authorized for use within the first 70 days, or equivalently up to 10 weeks of gestation, with this timeframe being updated in 2016.

The Democrat , who has been mentioned by numerous individuals including Trump are looking forward to running for president In 2028, issued the warning as part of a new proposition aimed at reducing the cost of prescription medications.

It's not the first time he's panicked about access to abortion drugs, having mandated the state bulk up on misoprostol in 2023.

Initially, he declined to keep mifepristone in stock because he felt it wasn’t ‘on the radar’ for pro-life supporters and due to its other medical applications.

The progressive governor attempted to present it as a move to lower the cost of prescription drugs irrespective of usage, while also making it evident that his aim was to safeguard access to abortion.

'Prescription drug prices are out of control and we're shining a light on hidden costs - while also giving CalRX more tools to respond to supply chain disruptions, market manipulation, or politically motivated abortion restrictions.'

Newsom acknowledged his desire for 'the capacity to safeguard access to reproductive healthcare services, such as mifepristone and other drugs being challenged in various states.'

Actually, a spokesperson for Planned Parenthood California stated that access to abortions faces an 'urgent danger' even though it remains legal in the Golden State.

'Shelby McMichael stated that Planned Parenthood Affiliates of California supports every tool aimed at safeguarding reproductive healthcare, which includes ensuring continued access to medication abortion within the state.' Sacramento Bee .

Fourteen states already have almost complete restrictions on abortions, so these states wouldn’t be significantly affected by this ruling since their laws generally prohibit medication-induced abortions in most situations.

More than a handful of other states had passed other restrictions since Roe fell  including bans on abortion starting at six weeks to eighteen weeks that could see some access impacted if the pill mifepristone were further limited.

According to the Guttmacher Institute, a pro-abortion rights research organization, 15 states, not including the states with near-total abortion bans, currently have additional restrictions specifically on medication abortion already in place beyond the FDA rules.

The most frequent restriction involves mandating that the abortion pill must be administered by a doctor.

In 2016, the FDA broadened the eligibility for prescribing the abortion pill to include not just physicians but also professionals like nurse practitioners and physician assistants. However, as of now, fifteen states still mandate that it must be administered by a doctor.

In 2021, the FDA altered the rules for in-person distribution due to the coronavirus outbreak; however, at least five states still mandate that patients must personally see a doctor.

Moreover, Wisconsin mandates that patients receive the initial dose under a doctor’s supervision, and Arizona prohibits sending abortion medications through the mail.

In 2023, the FDA likewise granted approval for permitting pharmacies to distribute mifepristone directly to patients.

However, as the issue regarding access to abortion pills reached the Supreme Court, states that had broadened abortion rights expressed concerns about potential repercussions, leading several states to begin adopting preventive measures.

As these regions began to contemplate the potential reintroduction of limitations on abortion pills, some initiated stocking up on the medications utilized for medical abortions during the previous year.

Newsom, at age 57, served as one of the Democrats’ most eloquent representatives last year. Despite dismissing speculations about his potential presidential bid, he actively campaigned for reelecting President Biden.

'I'd love him to run for president on the other side,' Trump said of Newsom last week.

Newsom has had disagreements with several Trump administration policies; however, he recently expressed willingness to collaborate with the president regarding a proposed $7.5 billion film production tax credit following Trump’s unexpected suggestion to impose a 100 percent tariff on movies "made abroad."

He mentioned Newsom in an indirect manner, yet again transforming his name into an insult by referring to him as 'Gavin New-scum.' This occurred while sitting next to the newly appointed Canadian Prime Minister, Mark Carney, during an event where Trump eased off his effort to make Canada The 51st state by stating "it takes two to tango."

Trump, at 78 years old, began criticizing a high-speed rail initiative that Californian voters had supported way back in 2008, with expenses now skyrocketing to around $100 billion.

As Trump put it in the Oval Office, it is a 'small train traveling from San Francisco to Los Angeles That's being managed by Gavin Newscum, the governor of California.

"He mentioned that the train project has the worst cost overruns he's ever witnessed. It’s completely uncontrolled," Trump stated.

He lamented that it's "hundreds of billions of dollars wasted on this foolish project that shouldn’t have been constructed."

Read more